Performance · Case Studies
General-purpose AI can summarise an SOA.
Verbatio is tuned to review it.
These examples frame how a structured RG 175 review workflow can surface more actionable review points than general-purpose prompting alone.
That matters because AFSL review teams still retain accountability and need repeatable processes they can inspect, challenge, and improve over time.
Case Studies
Verbatio surfaces more review points than general-purpose AI on the same SOA
The workflow is tuned for clause-mapped review rather than broad summarisation, helping teams spot more issues worth human follow-up.
Better coverage supports human reviewers; it does not replace their responsibility to assess the advice before sign-off.
Number of potential review issues surfaced per model
Review coverage across core SOA themes
Coverage where SOA reviewers
usually need structure
The advantage is not just more findings. It is better coverage across the categories reviewers repeatedly check in advice documents.
Structured for review, not just drafting.
General-purpose AI answers prompts. Verbatio is designed to support repeatable SOA review against a named standard.
Try the SOA sandbox